ZHANG Shi-jie, WANG Ru-min, LIAO Ying-qiang. A comparative study of two kinds of T800 carbon fibers produced by different spinning methods for the production of filament-wound pressure vessels. New Carbon Mater., 2019, 34(6): 578-586. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(19)60033-8
Citation: ZHANG Shi-jie, WANG Ru-min, LIAO Ying-qiang. A comparative study of two kinds of T800 carbon fibers produced by different spinning methods for the production of filament-wound pressure vessels. New Carbon Mater., 2019, 34(6): 578-586. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(19)60033-8

A comparative study of two kinds of T800 carbon fibers produced by different spinning methods for the production of filament-wound pressure vessels

doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(19)60033-8
Funds:  High Performance Carbon Fiber Project (TDZX-16-003-02).
  • Received Date: 2019-10-15
  • Accepted Date: 2020-01-03
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-12-10
  • Publish Date: 2019-12-28
  • The surface morphologies of two T800 carbon fibers produced from polyacrylonitrile by dry-jet wet spinning and wet spinning were compared. The mechanical properties of Naval Ordnance Laboratory (NOL) rings made from their composites with an epoxy resin matrix, and the strain distributions and hydrostatic breaking pressures of filament-wound pressure vessels produced from them were investigated. Results indicated that dry-jet wet spinning resulted in carbon fibers with a smooth surface while wet spinning gave rise to many surface grooves with uneven widths and depths on the fiber surface. Comparing the two fibers in epoxy resin composite NOL ring tests, those with the wet-spun T800 carbon fibers were more brittle, but had a higher interlaminar shear strength. A filament-wound pressure vessel using the wet-spun T800 carbon fibers was easier to burst at a place located between the dome and the cylinder while that using the dry-jet wet-spun carbon fibers was burst without a preferred broken location in a hydrostatic test. For a 150 mm diameter filament-wound pressure vessel made of the T800 wet-spun carbon fibers, the performance factor (PV/Wc, where P is pressure, V is the volume and Wc is the composite weight) is 34.8 km, which is significantly lower than one made using the T800 dry-jet wet-spun carbon fibers (47.2 km), indicating that the dry-jet wet spun carbon fibers are more suitable for preparing a filament-wound pressure vessel.
  • loading
  • Demir I, Sayman O, Dogan A, et al. The effects of repeated transverse impact load on the burst pressure of composite pressure vessel[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2015, 68:121-125.
    Ramanjaneyulu V, Balakrishna V, Murthy R, et al. Analysis of composite rocket motor case using finite element method[J]. Materials Today:Proceedings, 2018, 5(2):4920-4929.
    Wu Q, Chen X, Fan Z, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of impact on filament-wound composite cylinder[J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2017, 30(5):540-549.
    Yang Y, Pan Y, Feng Z, et al. Evaluation of aerospace carbon fibers[J]. New Carbon Materials, 2014, 29(3):161-168.
    Kuznetsov V M, Nekhoroshikh G E. Application of carbon fiber reinforced plastics in the manufacture of toroidal pressure vessels[J]. Polymer Science, Series D, 2015,8(3):231-234.
    Joselin R, Chelladurai T. Burst pressure prediction of composite pressure chambers using acoustic emission technique:a review[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 11(4):344-356.
    Wang C, Dong X, Wang Q. Effect of coagulation on the structure and property of PAN nascent fibers during dry jet wet-spinning[J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2009, 16(6), 719-724.
    Wang M, Bian W, Jiang Z. Estimate of carbon fiber's fracture toughness based on the small angle X-ray diffraction[J]. Polymer Bulletin, 2017, 74(10):4143-4151.
    Kovarskii A L, Kasparov V V, Krivandin A V, et al. EPR spectroscopic and X-Ray diffraction studies of carbon fibers with different mechanical properties[J]. Russian Journal Physcal Chemistry B, 2017, 11(2):233-241.
    Li W, Long D, Miyawaki J, et al. Structural features of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2012, 47(2):919-928.
    Jing M, Tan T, Wang C, et al. Comparison on the micro-structure of Toray T800H and T800S carbon fiber[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2015, 23(2):45-52.
    Samoilov V M, Verbets D B, Bubnenkov I A, et al. Influence of graphitization conditions at 3000℃ on structural and mechanical properties of high-modulus polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers[J]. Inorganic Materials:Applied Research, 2018, 9(5):890-899.
    Xu J, An Q, Cai X, et al. Drilling machinability evaluation on new developed high-strength T800S/250F CFRP laminates[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacture, 2013, 14(10):1687-1696.
    Wang F, Zhang B, Ma J, et al. Computation of the distribution of the fiber-matrix interface cracks in the edge trimming of CFRP[J]. Applied Composite Materials, 2019, 26:159-186.
    Li L, Pan Y, Zhu S, et al. A comparative study of the fuzz produced by friction and tension in China T800 and Toray T800H carbon fiber tows[J]. New Carbon Materials, 2018, 33(4):377-384.
    Chen X, Wang X. T800 carbon fiber in the application of composite pressure vessel research[J]. Hi-tech Fiber & Application, 2017, 42(3):45-49.
    Zhang J, Karbhari V, Wu L, et al. Field exposure based durability assessment of FRP column wrap systems[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2003, 34(1):41-50.
    Chen W, Yu Y, Li P, et al. Effect of new epoxy matrix for T800 carbon fiber/epoxy filament wound composites[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2007, 67(11-12):2261-2270.
    Newcomb B A. Processing, structure, and properties of carbon fibers composites[J]. Part A:Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016, 91:262-282.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(423) PDF Downloads(278) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return